How Recent Court Decisions Affect Mandatory Arbitration

March 5, 2019

Katz Banks Kumin partner Lisa Banks spoke at a CPR Institute panel about how recent court decisions and regulatory developments affect mandatory arbitration in employment disputes.

Ms. Banks addressed the recent Supreme Court case, Epic Systems v. Lewis, which permitted employers’ use of mandatory arbitration clauses to prohibit employees from pursuing collective actions. The panel discussed the implications for employees who are prohibited from arbitrating collectively, or as a class. Considering the impact of the court’s decision on the future of employment class actions, the panel explored how future administrations may try to work around the verdict through regulatory measures.

Ms. Banks also discussed Henry Schein v. Archer & White Sales, in which the Supreme Court ruled unanimously that courts do not have the power to override the contract signed by the parties. Instead, the issue of arbitrability is delegated to an arbitrator. Ms. Banks spoke about what unanswered questions still remain in light of Schein, and how amicus briefs should be used to try to influence arbitration law.

Our Offices

Washington, DC
Katz Banks Kumin LLP

11 Dupont Circle NW, Suite 600
Washington, DC 20036

Phone: 202-299-1140
Philadelphia, PA
Katz Banks Kumin LLP

1845 Walnut St., 25th Floor
Philadelphia, PA 19103

Phone: 215-735-2171
San Francisco, CA
Katz Banks Kumin LLP

150 California St., 16th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111

Phone: 415-813-3260