Despite drastic increases in women in the workforce, and the expansion of employment opportunities for women, discrimination based on sex continues to pose significant barriers for working women (and sometimes men). Unfortunately, the numbers indicate that sex discrimination occurs frequently in the workplace. From 2000-2010 the EEOC received between 24,000 and 29,000 complaints of sex discrimination every year, making it one of the most common types of complaints. In 2010, complaints of sex discrimination comprised 30% of all complaints made to the EEOC.
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as well as state and local laws, prohibit an employer from discriminating against an employee because of that employee’s sex. The attorneys of Katz Banks Kumin have litigated numerous sex discrimination cases in state and federal court.
What Does The Law Prohibit?
Federal, state, and local laws forbid an employer from discriminating based on sex with respect to all terms and conditions of their employment, which include hiring, compensation, promotion, treatment on the job, and termination. They also prevent employers from making employment decisions based on stereotypes or assumptions about the abilities, traits, or performance capability of an individual.
Disparate Treatment Discrimination
The law prohibits an employer from deliberately treating employees less favorably because of their sex. This type of disparate treatment may be in the form of adverse employment actions such as refusing to hire, refusing to provide training, denying promotions, denying equal compensation and benefits, disciplining, and firing.
Disparate treatment discrimination includes sexual harassment. Sexual harassment can be shown either by a tangible employment action, such as firing an employee for refusing an employer’s sexual advances, or by the existence of a hostile work environment. Federal and local laws protect victims of harassment regardless of their gender and regardless of the gender of the harasser. This includes same-sex sexual harassment.
Disparate Impact Discrimination
“Disparate Impact” discrimination occurs when an apparently objective policy has a disproportionately negative effect on members of one sex as compared to members of the other sex, and the employer is unable to show that the policy is job-related and justified by business necessity. An example of disparate impact discrimination is hiring criteria that tend to screen out women, such as a height requirement not justified by any business necessity.
Federal, state, and local laws also prohibit retaliation against employees who oppose sex discrimination (such as by filing internal complaints, filing a charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, etc.). Retaliation may take any of the forms above, as well as any action which could dissuade a reasonable employee from making or supporting a charge of discrimination.
Title VII is the federal law that prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex. The Pregnancy Discrimination Act, an amendment to Title VII, prohibits an employer from discriminating against you based on your pregnancy.
Which employers are covered?
Title VII applies to employers with 15 or more employees for each working day in each of 20 or more calendar weeks in the current or preceding calendar year, including private employers, state and local government employers. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e(b). It also applies to labor organizations and employment agencies, 42 U.S.C. § 200e-2(b)-(d), and to the federal government, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16, although there are different procedures for a federal employee to pursue a discrimination claim. Even if your employer employs fewer than 15 employees, it may be considered a covered employer under Title VII if it has acted jointly with a parent or subsidiary corporation, and together the employees number more than 15; to determine whether the companies have acted jointly, a court would focus on factors such as the degree of interrelationship, degree of common ownership, control, and management, and degree of centralization of personnel functions. See, e.g., Nesbit v. Gears United, Inc., 347 F.3d 72, 84 (3d Cir. 2003) (describing factors).
What remedies are available?
If a court finds you have been discriminated or retaliated against in violation of Title VII, you may be entitled to remedies including:
- Reinstatement, compelled hiring, or compelled promotion
- Back pay
- Front pay
- Retroactive seniority and benefits
- Compensatory and punitive damages (punitive damages not available against government employers)
- Attorneys’ fees
How do I vindicate my rights?
You must file a charge with the EEOC in order to seek a legal remedy for sex discrimination or retaliation that violated Title VII. You must file your charge within 180 days from the date of the alleged violation in order to protect your ability to vindicate your rights under Title VII. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(e)(1). If you live in a state that has a state law prohibiting sex discrimination, however, this 180-day filing deadline is extended to 300 days or 30 days after you have received notice of termination of state proceedings if that date is earlier, because you are required to file a charge with the appropriate agency in your state. Id.
The EEOC or your state or local agency will investigate your charge of discrimination, and if it determines your charge has merit, it will attempt to foster conciliation between you and the employer. However, most EEOC field offices do not have the capacity to act on most complaints in a timely manner. Regardless of the EEOC’s determination, you may bring a civil action in court after 90 days have passed since you filed your charge by requesting a “right-to-sue” letter from the EEOC. See 29 C.F.R. § 1601.28(e).
If you are a federal employee, you must first initiate a complaint by contacting your employing agency’s EEO counselor within 45 days of the alleged violation. If the complaint the complaint cannot be resolved informally, you must file a formal written complaint with the agency that discriminated against you within 15 days of the notice of the EEO counselor’s failure to resolve the matter. 29 C.F.R. §§ 1614.105(a)(1), .106(b). The agency investigation must be completed within 180 days of the date the complaint or its last amendment was filed, or within 360 days of the date the original complaint was filed, whichever is earlier. 29 C.F.R. §1614.108. A court action must be filed within 90 days of receipt of notice of final action on the formal written complaint. 42 U.S.C. §2000e-16(c).
State And Local Laws
State and local laws also prohibit the unfavorable treatment of an employee because of his or her sex. In large part these statutes mirror Title VII. However, the specifics vary state to state, and often, the language of the local laws may be broader than Title VII. Accordingly, plaintiffs may be able to pursue claims for damages and other relief under these statutes in addition to those provided by Title VII. For example, the D.C. anti-discrimination law does not include a cap on damages or a requirement that the employee first file an administrative complaint. Similarly, several counties in Maryland have anti-discrimination statutes that apply to all employers in the county regardless of size.
If you are experiencing – or have already experienced – discrimination based on your gender that you are thinking about reporting, or if you have already reported discrimination and are facing retaliation, contact the experienced lawyers at Katz Banks Kumin for an evaluation of your case with no further obligation.